[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.18 release notes
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: 2.18 release notes |
Date: |
Sun, 10 Nov 2013 11:29:10 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
James <address@hidden> writes:
> I'll make a patch.
>
> I'm not sure how the process will work (from my own point of view anyway)
> as Patchy only tests against master and we've split of 2.18, so I'll do the
> make and make check/doc manually if that is OK?
>
> Assuming it is all OK, and goes through the countdown, do I just 'git push
> HEAD:stable/2.18'?
No, stable/2.18 is my turf. You just go through the standard process in
relation to master. If you don't want to actually push to master, you
can send me a git format-patch version against master (or stable/2.18 if
you want to rebase there yourself) and I'll take it from there.
If that's too complex, just stay relative to master and push to staging.
Once it went through cleanly, I'll cherry-pick from master into
stable/2.18 (fixing the merge conflict) and revert in staging
afterwards.
2.18-only changes are a bit of a nuisance to deal with, but fortunately
there are not all that many of them.
--
David Kastrup
- 2.18 release notes, Pavel Roskin, 2013/11/08
- Re: 2.18 release notes, James, 2013/11/08
- Re: 2.18 release notes, Pavel Roskin, 2013/11/09
- Re: 2.18 release notes, Janek Warchoł, 2013/11/10
- Re: 2.18 release notes, James, 2013/11/10
- Re: 2.18 release notes,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: 2.18 release notes, Janek Warchoł, 2013/11/10
- Re: 2.18 release notes, James, 2013/11/10
- Re: 2.18 release notes, David Kastrup, 2013/11/10
- Re: 2.18 release notes, James, 2013/11/10