[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: branching
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: branching |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Dec 2013 15:23:40 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Mike Solomon <address@hidden> writes:
> Hey all,
>
> As 2.18 draws near, I’d like to work with everyone to establish a
> system of branching for LilyPond development. After several rounds of
> discussing things with David K, this emerged as the best way to avoid
> arguments about integrating work into the development branch that have
> led several contributors, including myself, to significantly reduce
> time on the project. [1]
It will take me considerable time to address this more thoroughly, but
in the mean time I want to have on record that what Mike writes here
under "this emerged as the best way" _not_ in _any_ way summarizing our
discussion. Instead it is his _personal_ idea how to address topics we
covered. Writing something like "this emerged as the best way" when we
did not even talk about it wrongly insinuates that it presents a common
understanding of how to address problems covered in the discussion.
Feel free to quote passages or complete mails from me in the course of
that discussion: there is nothing in there that I would not have equally
said in public.
--
David Kastrup
- branching, Mike Solomon, 2013/12/10
- Re: branching, Graham Percival, 2013/12/10
- Re: branching,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: branching, Carl Sorensen, 2013/12/10
- Re: branching, Mike Solomon, 2013/12/10
- Re: branching, Carl Peterson, 2013/12/10
- Re: branching, David Nalesnik, 2013/12/10
- Re: branching, Mike Solomon, 2013/12/11
- centralization of lilypond development and forking (was: branching), Graham Percival, 2013/12/11
- Re: centralization of lilypond development and forking (was: branching), Mike Solomon, 2013/12/11