[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: branching
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: branching |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Dec 2013 08:19:33 +0100 (CET) |
> One thing that is important to restate is that I realize that,
> unlike my bad-but-getting-better commenting style, _all_ of this is
> out of David’s control in that it stems from a medical issue. Which
> means that the communication problems won’t go away - they’re going
> to be a fixture of LilyPond development so long as he’s involved.
> As a group of humans, it is _everyone’s_ responsibility to find
> creative ways to get past handicaps because _no one_ wants to have
> them. What I’d like to see is a situation where David can blow off
> steam however he needs to, he doesn’t feel like people are ignoring
> him, and LilyPond can be a dynamic, multiplayer environment without
> people getting offended and leaving the project.
I fully agree. I got into the habit of contacting apparently offended
people off-list to explain the very reasons why communication on this
list can be tedious sometimes.
And please remember the most important thing: There is *never* an
intention, as far as I can see, to offend people. The more factual
the discussion, the better it works.
Werner
- Re: branching, (continued)
Re: branching, Carl Sorensen, 2013/12/10
- Re: branching, Mike Solomon, 2013/12/10
- Re: branching, Carl Peterson, 2013/12/10
- Re: branching, David Nalesnik, 2013/12/10
- Re: branching, Mike Solomon, 2013/12/11
- centralization of lilypond development and forking (was: branching), Graham Percival, 2013/12/11
- Re: centralization of lilypond development and forking (was: branching), Mike Solomon, 2013/12/11
- Re: branching,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: branching, David Kastrup, 2013/12/11
- Re: branching, Mike Solomon, 2013/12/11
- Re: branching, Mike Solomon, 2013/12/11
- Re: branching, Trevor Daniels, 2013/12/11
- Re: branching, Mike Solomon, 2013/12/11
Re: branching, David Kastrup, 2013/12/11
Re: branching, Mike Solomon, 2013/12/11