[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
regtest for new glyphs necessary?
|
From: |
Marc Hohl |
|
Subject: |
regtest for new glyphs necessary? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 02 Jan 2014 16:06:48 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 |
Hello list,
happy new year to you all!
I have drawn some new glyphs for LilyPond, namely
1) the double G clef, mentioned in
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00029.html
2) the varpercussion clef, mentiaoned in the same message
3) the tenor G clef, mentioned in
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2013-11/msg00661.html
4) the alternate C clef, issue 693
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=693
I am about to upload a patch for these four glyphs within the next
days, but I wanted to ask whether a new (or enhanced expisting)
regtest is necessary for this type of enhancement?
Regards,
Marc
- regtest for new glyphs necessary?,
Marc Hohl <=