[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: regtest for new glyphs necessary?
|
From: |
Keith OHara |
|
Subject: |
Re: regtest for new glyphs necessary? |
|
Date: |
Fri, 3 Jan 2014 07:03:34 +0000 (UTC) |
|
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Marc Hohl <marc <at> hohlart.de> writes:
> I am about to upload a patch for these four glyphs within the next
> days, but I wanted to ask whether a new (or enhanced existing)
> regtest is necessary for this type of enhancement?
They could conceivably be broken accidentally, by a mistaken change
to our .mf files or a metafont bug, so a regression test is useful.
LilyPond probably has too many tests, but you could add to 'clefs.ly'