Re: Web:Introduction: Rename "Our Goal" box (issue 48430043)

[Urs Liska]

Am 07.01.2014 14:41, schrieb Carl Peterson:
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Urs Liska <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Am 07.01.2014 14:32, schrieb Carl Sorensen:
> >
> > > On Jan 7, 2014, at 3:56 AM, "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> wrote:
> > >
> > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: <address@hidden>
> > > > To: <address@hidden>
> > > > Cc: <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 10:45 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: Web:Introduction: Rename "Our Goal" box (issue 48430043)
> > > >
> > > > > Any other suggestions?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "Our goal" :-)  No less achieved than a mission.
> > >
> > > Intent
> > > Object
> > > Ambition
> > > Desire
> > > Hope
> > > Plan
> > > Aim
> > >
> > >
> > > Carl
> >
> >
> > Thanks for the suggestions. But I'm afraid only the first three would be
> > appropriate at all, and even these aren't better than "Goal" or "Mission" or
> > "Objective".
> >
> > I've uploaded a second patchset with David's "Objective" suggestion, but I'm
> > nearly ready to revert it to "Goal" after Phil's last email.
> >
> > Urs
>
> I believe I had suggested "purpose." I realize that's not much better
> than goal/mission, but it's less corporate than "mission," and is more
> focused on why we exist than what we think we've accomplished (as goal
> and objective are), in my opinion.
>
> Carl P.

Yes I recall that. For me this somehow sounds wrong - but again that may 
be due to my non-native "ear".
Phil, what do you think about "purpose"?

Urs