Re: Pre-review questions about image(s) and translations

[Paul Morris]

Carl Peterson wrote
> Maybe not texidoc-wise, but it's something I thought about on its own
> merits. I'm personally not crazy about is as it would basically result in
> us creating a very specialized set of CSS parameters for a very specific
> thing that could be changed and completely removed or made incompatible
> with what is coded. That said, Paul is right. It is technically doable
> (and
> in a way that gracefully degrades to text browsers), but I'm not sure
> that's the ideal route from the maintenance side of things.

Those are good points.  Using inline styles would be a way to address these
issues, while raising others... but maybe it wouldn't work with texidoc
anyway.  

I gave a markup version a try:

\version "2.18.0"

\markup \center-column {
  \box \pad-markup #1 {
    \line \rounded-box \pad-markup #1 
      { "Plain Editor" "Dedicated Editor" "IDE" }
  }
  \combine
    \draw-line #'(0 . 4)
    \arrow-head #Y #DOWN ##f
  \box \pad-markup #1 \with-color #blue 
    { "LilyPond input file(s)"}
  \combine
    \draw-line #'(0 . 4)
    \arrow-head #Y #DOWN ##f
  \rounded-box \pad-markup #1 
    {"LilyPond"}
  \combine
    \draw-line #'(0 . 4)
    \arrow-head #Y #DOWN ##f
  \box \pad-markup #1 {
    \line \box \pad-markup #1 \with-color #blue 
      { "PDF" "SVG" "PNG" "MIDI" "More..." }
  }
}

-Paul



--
View this message in context: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Pre-review-questions-about-image-s-and-translations-tp157874p157949.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.