Re: Cannot 'make' current master with (or without) PATCHY

[Phil Holmes]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
To: "James" <address@hidden>; "Devel" <address@hidden>
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 10:18 AM
Subject: Re: Cannot 'make' current master with (or without) PATCHY


> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "James" <address@hidden>
> To: "Devel" <address@hidden>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 9:58 AM
> Subject: Cannot 'make' current master with (or without) PATCHY
>
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've been having problems with patchy these last few days, often it is 
> > just an artifact of testing so many different and disparate patches so 
> > that I have cleaned down my temp directories (where all the automated 
> > build stuff is kept) and also deleted the test-* branches that patchy 
> > creates when it runs.
> >
> > However there does seem to be a problem.
> >
> > I was still unable to pass 'make' on any patches as of last night, and 
> > after my clean down this morning I still could not do any 'make' (not 
> > make test or make test-baseline or even make doc, but just plain old 
> > 'make'). It fails with an error.
> >
> > So I cleaned down again made sure master was up to date in my own git and 
> > then simply did an out of tree build with no patches applied and it still 
> > failed on make.
> >
> > I then used a new install of LilyDev and again it failed. So can someone 
> > else just try to 'make' from the current master (no need to make doc or 
> > anything so time consuming) and let me know if they get the same thing as 
> > I am?
>
> As you can probably see from git, my version of patchy ran fine yesterday. 
> I've also been running make (albeit with a non-clean tree) last night and 
> today without a problem.  Have you tried a nuke build and reconfig from 
> scratch?


OK - I've just done that and the build failed.  My guess is that it's to do 
with Han-Wen's recent build changes, and is masked by using make-clean 
rather than a full nuke, for some reason.  I'm bisecting to check.

--
Phil Holmes