[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue 3286: add single-C time signature style (issue 164830043 by ad
From: |
Dan Eble |
Subject: |
Re: Issue 3286: add single-C time signature style (issue 164830043 by address@hidden) |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Oct 2014 17:19:23 -0400 |
> On Oct 26, 2014, at 16:21 , Joram <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> The way I have been looking at it, c represents quadruple meter and ¢
>> represents duple.
>
> This is an interpretation I guessed from 4/4=c and 2/2=¢, too. But I don’t
> think it is correct from the above mail by Simon, which I found quite
> convincing.
He wrote, "alla breve means ‘in units of a brevis’, that is 4/2 or 2/1.” I
don’t see how you can conclude that he meant that ¢ always means half notes.
Simon, would you be kind enough to clarify it for us?
> I havn’t seen the double cc and ¢¢ so far. But wasn’t your style called
> single-C?
I haven’t implemented the double-C cases yet. If I do (I hope to) they will be
in a style with a different name. Part of me thinks they would be at home in
the default style (supported by ¢¢ being used for the Schubert piece) but I am
not sure that changing the default is a good idea. I might add a CC style, but
it’s not friendly to have too many choices. I might end the equivalence of
default and C and add the double-C cases to the C style, leaving the default as
it is. I’m not sure which concerns I favor.
Maybe there should be a way for the user to define a style globally; but I’m
not into working hard for something rarely needed. Overriding the stencil is
effective.
> - I appreciate this work on a new time signature style.
Thanks.
Simon, since you’re the one who requested the feature, how well does using
\time 2/1 with the single-C style suit your needs? I understand that you
originally suggested 4/2, but considering the other examples as well, would you
be satisfied with the new style?
—
Dan