[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PDF is broken for @notation{} encoding
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: PDF is broken for @notation{} encoding |
Date: |
Tue, 26 May 2015 13:43:06 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Kastrup" <address@hidden>
> To: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
> Cc: "James Lowe" <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 11:57 AM
> Subject: Re: PDF is broken for @notation{} encoding
>> Huh. Git bisect would have heeded the _topological_ order and would
>> have made it more likely you'd have found the correct commit. There is
>> a git bisect command for reporting an untestable commit, namely "git
>> bisect skip".
>>
>> So my best guess is that the change I identified is the culprit here and
>> that your homegrown bisection did not produce the right commit.
>>
>> As you can see, the commit you identified is _chronologically_ just
>> above a commit in the other branch, but both branches have a long
>> separate history of commits by which they differ previous to that.
>>
>> --
>> David Kastrup
>
>
> Thanks. I'd almost reached that conclusion based on my own look at
> git log --graph. I'm starting a "proper" bisect now, rebuilding the
> binaries and docs from scratch for each step. Should give the
> processor a decent work-out. Catch you in a few hours...
Let's cut this short. Test this patch first. If it fixes the problem,
the bisection is pointless.
>From 9694bdb862095af43c5686f2214e3fb879d42359 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Kastrup <address@hidden>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 13:42:14 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Fix spurious newline from upstream Texinfo
---
tex/texinfo.tex | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tex/texinfo.tex b/tex/texinfo.tex
index dead322..f231db8 100644
--- a/tex/texinfo.tex
+++ b/tex/texinfo.tex
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
% Load plain if necessary, i.e., if running under initex.
\expandafter\ifx\csname fmtname\endcsname\relax\input plain\fi
%
-\def\texinfoversion{2015-04-30.19}
+\def\texinfoversion{2015-05-26.13}
%
% Copyright 1985, 1986, 1988, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995,
% 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006,
@@ -8956,7 +8956,6 @@ directory should work if nowhere else does.}
\catcode\count255=#1\relax
\advance\count255 by 1
\repeat
-
}
% @documentencoding sets the definition of non-ASCII characters
--
2.1.4
--
David Kastrup
- Re: PDF is broken for @notation{} encoding, (continued)
- Re: PDF is broken for @notation{} encoding, James Lowe, 2015/05/26
- Re: PDF is broken for @notation{} encoding, David Kastrup, 2015/05/26
- Re: PDF is broken for @notation{} encoding, James Lowe, 2015/05/26
- Re: PDF is broken for @notation{} encoding, David Kastrup, 2015/05/26
- Re: PDF is broken for @notation{} encoding, Phil Holmes, 2015/05/26
- Re: PDF is broken for @notation{} encoding, David Kastrup, 2015/05/26
- Re: PDF is broken for @notation{} encoding, David Kastrup, 2015/05/26
- Re: PDF is broken for @notation{} encoding, Phil Holmes, 2015/05/26
- Re: PDF is broken for @notation{} encoding, David Kastrup, 2015/05/26
- Re: PDF is broken for @notation{} encoding, Phil Holmes, 2015/05/26
- Re: PDF is broken for @notation{} encoding,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: PDF is broken for @notation{} encoding, Phil Holmes, 2015/05/26
- Re: PDF is broken for @notation{} encoding, David Kastrup, 2015/05/26