[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.19.26 regtests
From: |
Masamichi HOSODA |
Subject: |
Re: 2.19.26 regtests |
Date: |
Mon, 31 Aug 2015 23:17:49 +0900 (JST) |
>>>There's lots of differences, presumably down to font changes,
>>
>> Also sans \bold and \italic do not seem to work in
>> font-family-override.ly
>
> Well, I call uh-oh. It will probably take a few more unstable releases
> to shake out the problems from the font setup changes.
Probably, it caused by URW fonts problem and/or Pango version.
In my experiment, with newest URW fonts release (commit date is 2015-08-28)
and newest Pango (version 1.36.8, 2014-09), there is no problem.
Attached file is the result.
First, the previous URW fonts release (commit date is 2015-08-25) seems broken.
It has "Nimbus Sans Regular", "Nimbus Sans L Bold",
"Nimbus Sans L Regular Italic", "Nimbus Sans L Bold Italic".
Only "Regular" font's family name is "Nimbus Sans"
but others are "Nimbus Sans L".
http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696089
http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=urw-core35-fonts.git;a=commitdiff;h=ee2beed6
The newest URW fonts release has no "Nimbus Sans" but "Nimbus Sans L".
http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=urw-core35-fonts.git;a=commit;h=c983ed400dc278dcf20bdff68252fad6d9db7af9
Next, we use old Pango (version 1.28.3, 2010-09) in GUB.
In four years, many bugs would have been fixed.
So I'll make a GUB's patch that updates URW fonts and Pango.
Would I create an Issue on tracker?
How can I do so?
Or, would someone create it?