[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.19.26 regtests
From: |
Masamichi HOSODA |
Subject: |
Re: 2.19.26 regtests |
Date: |
Tue, 01 Sep 2015 02:40:29 +0900 (JST) |
I've post a message to the tracker.
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4585/
I've made a GUB's patch and send pull request.
https://github.com/gperciva/gub/pull/20
Would you merge it and try following command before make lilypond?
$ git fetch orign
$ git checkout master
$ git merge origin/master
$ rm -fr downloads/fonts-urw-core35/
> I've forwarded this to the bug list so someone should create a
> tracker.
>
> Please note the bug list is now at
> http://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/
>
> --
> Phil Holmes
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Masamichi HOSODA" <address@hidden>
> To: <address@hidden>
> Cc: <address@hidden>
> Sent: Monday, August 31, 2015 3:17 PM
> Subject: Re: 2.19.26 regtests
>
>
>>>>>There's lots of differences, presumably down to font changes,
>>>>
>>>> Also sans \bold and \italic do not seem to work in
>>>> font-family-override.ly
>>>
>>> Well, I call uh-oh. It will probably take a few more unstable
>>> releases
>>> to shake out the problems from the font setup changes.
>>
>> Probably, it caused by URW fonts problem and/or Pango version.
>>
>> In my experiment, with newest URW fonts release (commit date is
>> 2015-08-28)
>> and newest Pango (version 1.36.8, 2014-09), there is no problem.
>> Attached file is the result.
>>
>>
>> First, the previous URW fonts release (commit date is 2015-08-25)
>> seems broken.
>> It has "Nimbus Sans Regular", "Nimbus Sans L Bold",
>> "Nimbus Sans L Regular Italic", "Nimbus Sans L Bold Italic".
>> Only "Regular" font's family name is "Nimbus Sans"
>> but others are "Nimbus Sans L".
>>
>> http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696089
>> http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=urw-core35-fonts.git;a=commitdiff;h=ee2beed6
>>
>> The newest URW fonts release has no "Nimbus Sans" but "Nimbus Sans L".
>>
>> http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=urw-core35-fonts.git;a=commit;h=c983ed400dc278dcf20bdff68252fad6d9db7af9
>>
>>
>> Next, we use old Pango (version 1.28.3, 2010-09) in GUB.
>> In four years, many bugs would have been fixed.
>>
>>
>> So I'll make a GUB's patch that updates URW fonts and Pango.
>>
>>
>> Would I create an Issue on tracker?
>> How can I do so?
>> Or, would someone create it?
>>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lilypond-devel mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel