[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New context modifier \CompletionRhythms?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: New context modifier \CompletionRhythms? |
Date: |
Sat, 09 Apr 2016 16:00:41 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Dan Eble <address@hidden> writes:
> On Apr 1, 2016, at 17:59 , Simon Albrecht <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> the current syntax, as well as more concise. Another consideration
>> would be \CompletionRhythmsOn, but OTOH when would anybody need to
>> turn it _off_?
>
> Well,
>
> Are there any known issues that make this feature annoying in certain
> cases? any undesirable interactions with other options that are off by
> default?
>
> Does it always do the right thing with multi-measure rests? Does it
> work during cadenzas? Across staff changes (manual or automatic)?
> With \partcombine? etc.
>
> In other words, is this feature mature?
No. If you take a look at the code and history as compared with the
normal engravers, updates to them have not been copied to the completion
engravers.
--
David Kastrup