[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bad incipit for `Rhythms' section
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: bad incipit for `Rhythms' section |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Jul 2016 11:11:48 +0200 (CEST) |
>> The grace notes in the incipit for the `Rhythms' section are really
>> badly positioned – I would consider this a bug actually...
>
> Maybe we need a different afterGraceFraction value here?
I think it's not only a problem of a different `afterGraceFraction'...
> I mean, why isn't this an optional argument anyway? How is this
> aligned in the original?
Attached is a scan from IMSLP (Schenker edition from UE).
If I activate the commented-out line in `rhythms-headword.ly'
\override SpacingSpanner.strict-grace-spacing = ##t
and insert some \breaks to mimick the appearance in notation.pdf, I
get the attached result – which is ugly. A bug? IMHO, accidentals
and grace notes must not collide.
Werner
- bad incipit for `Rhythms' section, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/07/20
- Re: bad incipit for `Rhythms' section, David Kastrup, 2016/07/21
- Re: bad incipit for `Rhythms' section,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: bad incipit for `Rhythms' section, David Kastrup, 2016/07/21
- Re: bad incipit for `Rhythms' section, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/07/21
- Re: bad incipit for `Rhythms' section, David Kastrup, 2016/07/21
- Re: bad incipit for `Rhythms' section, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/07/21
- Re: bad incipit for `Rhythms' section, David Kastrup, 2016/07/21