[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bad incipit for `Rhythms' section
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: bad incipit for `Rhythms' section |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Jul 2016 11:39:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> writes:
>>> The grace notes in the incipit for the `Rhythms' section are really
>>> badly positioned – I would consider this a bug actually...
>>
>> Maybe we need a different afterGraceFraction value here?
>
> I think it's not only a problem of a different `afterGraceFraction'...
The main problem appears to be that there really does not appear to be a
point to align gracenotes unless they are sharing stems.
>> I mean, why isn't this an optional argument anyway? How is this
>> aligned in the original?
>
> Attached is a scan from IMSLP (Schenker edition from UE).
Basically, not aligned at all with other staves.
> If I activate the commented-out line in `rhythms-headword.ly'
>
> \override SpacingSpanner.strict-grace-spacing = ##t
>
> and insert some \breaks to mimick the appearance in notation.pdf, I
> get the attached result – which is ugly. A bug? IMHO, accidentals
> and grace notes must not collide.
"strict spacing" often implies collisions.
--
David Kastrup