[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*
From: |
Knut Petersen |
Subject: |
Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/* |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Dec 2016 13:34:09 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 |
Hi Alexander, hi everybody!
And we might need to offer a way to remove a LyricExtender event. Unless we go
the radical route and ...
After a bit of thinking I'd say: go the radical route.
Attached is a patch against current master that implements it that way. An
additional no-extender property
is added that can only be overridden by the force-extender property.
If a user doesn't want it, we need to provide a function \extenderOff (that
translates, e.g., to \override LyricExtender.stencil = ##f).
\layout {
\Lyrics
\override LyricExtender.no-extender = ##t
}
Only thing to consider there: We'd need a "stop sign" for extenders that shall
only extend to some point in a _ _ _ sequence, as required in a divisi lyrics setting.
"" and \markup\null are usefull, see 5th exampled in attached lyrextest.ly/pdf
I know that the documentation would need some work, but there is no reason to
start with that until
it is known that the changed code would be accepted.
Please test ...
cu,
Knut
0001-Automated-lyric-extenders.patch
Description: Text Data
lyrextest.ly
Description: Text Data
lyrextest.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, (continued)
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Alexander Kobel, 2016/12/14
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Knut Petersen, 2016/12/14
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Simon Albrecht, 2016/12/14
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Knut Petersen, 2016/12/14
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Alexander Kobel, 2016/12/14
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*,
Knut Petersen <=
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/12/15
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Knut Petersen, 2016/12/15
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/12/15
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Francisco Vila, 2016/12/15
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Simon Albrecht, 2016/12/15
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Knut Petersen, 2016/12/15
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Urs Liska, 2016/12/15
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Knut Petersen, 2016/12/15
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Knut Petersen, 2016/12/15
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/12/15