Re: make metronomeMarkFormatter more flexible (issue 327620043 by address@hidden)

[lilypond]

On 2017/10/10 18:47:14, Malte Meyn wrote:
> > I think it would make sense to check all forms a \tempo mark
currently can
> take
> > and then see what principal forms those can assume.

> […]

> I’m not sure what you mean by “principal forms”. Could you explain? I
made a
> list of limitations that the metronome mark formatter currently has:

This is a huge list and I’m not sure everything in that list should be
supported (and probably I missed some other things that should). So I
think we need a collection of real-world examples, or—easier—look into
Gould’s “Behind Bars” or similar literature as a reference. There we
might also find how to handle tuplets and tied notes. Unfortunately I
don’t own a copy of that book.

https://codereview.appspot.com/327620043/