Re: add glyphs for 256th, 512th and 1024th flags and rests (issue 336590043 by address@hidden)

[lilypond]

Reviewers: thomasmorley651,

Message:
On 2018/02/21 22:44:42, thomasmorley651 wrote:
> I suggest to update regtests ‘markup-rest.ly’ and
‘markup-rest-styles.ly’ as
> well.
> If no glyph for a certain style is found the default is taken anyway,
but it
> would be nice if the new glyphs would be demonstrated via markup as
well.

Do we really need that triple occurence? OTOH, could you suggest where
to regtest the flags?

> Also, it deserves an entry in changes, imho.

Agreed. There is at least one other patch I made that needs a Changes
entry (issue 5247, maybe 5249, maybe 3208 after 5258 is fixed too) but
at the moment I’m not able to make doc for testing (see list).

Description:
add glyphs for 256th, 512th and 1024th flags and rests

This post on lilypond-user asks for small rhythmic values (though it
doesn’t explicitely mention rests and unbeamed/flagged notes):
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2018-02/msg00614.html

1024th is the shortest duration suggested by SMuFL.

Needs special focus in review:
• forms of downstem flags

Needs improvement but I don’t know how to do:
• dot position for very short rests (see regtest)

Contains also:
• adjust stem lengths for 256th, 512th, and 1024th flags
• Notation Reference: change shortest value from 128th to 1024th
• add very short rests to regtest

Please review this at https://codereview.appspot.com/336590043/

Affected files (+650, -135 lines):
  M Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely
  M input/regression/rest.ly
  M mf/feta-flags.mf
  M mf/feta-rests.mf
  M ps/encodingdefs.ps
  M scm/define-grobs.scm