[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: transpose, transposition, and relative
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: transpose, transposition, and relative |
Date: |
Thu, 3 Feb 2005 11:23:41 +0100 |
address@hidden writes:
> As far as I understand, the point of \transposition is that you can make
> a printed version of the music and a MIDI version of the same music
> without having to make two separate \score{...} sections (one with
> \transpose and one without). In other words, \transposition solves
> a completely different problem than \transpose. Of course, if this is
> unclear in the documentation, it should be improved.
It's slightly hairier. Classical brass parts, esp. Horn and Clarinet
parts, tend to change transpositions during a piece. You cannot
capture that with a \score and \transpose.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | address@hidden | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
- Re: transpose, transposition, and relative, (continued)
- Re: transpose, transposition, and relative, Graham Percival, 2005/02/05
- Re: transpose, transposition, and relative, David Raleigh Arnold, 2005/02/05
- Re: transpose, transposition, and relative, Graham Percival, 2005/02/06
- Re: transpose, transposition, and relative, Anthony W. Youngman, 2005/02/07
- Re: transpose, transposition, and relative, David Raleigh Arnold, 2005/02/07
- Message not available
- Re: transpose, transposition, and relative, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/02/03
- Re: transpose, transposition, and relative, lilypond, 2005/02/03
- Re: transpose, transposition, and relative, David Raleigh Arnold, 2005/02/03
Re: transpose, transposition, and relative, Graham King, 2005/02/02
Re: transpose, transposition, and relative, Mats Bengtsson, 2005/02/03
- Re: transpose, transposition, and relative,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=
Re: transpose, transposition, and relative, lilypond, 2005/02/03