|
From: | Mats Bengtsson |
Subject: | Re: multimeasure rests with proper measure numbering |
Date: | Mon, 09 Jul 2007 23:22:26 +0200 |
User-agent: | Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.5) |
I think you are missing something very basic and I hope the following example can help you realize how to use multimeasure rests. It's always much easier to get relevant answers if you includean example (preferably short but complete) of the LilyPond code you have tried.
m = \relative c'{ c1 | d | e | f | R1*4 \break | g1 | f | e | d | } % Conductors score: \score{ \new StaffGroup << \new Staff \m >> } % Instrumental part: \score{ \new Staff {\set Score.skipBars = ##t \m } } As you can see, the bar numbering is correct in both versions of the music. /Mats Quoting Dewdman42 <address@hidden>:
I figured out how to create a multimeasure rest, but it seems that the measure numbering does not reflect what may be in the conductors score. So for example, if I have a conductors score and some part sheets, and one of the parts has 12 bars to wait. I would like them to see one bar with the multi-measure rest set to 12 bars, but then I want the next measure to be numbered measure #13, not #2. Is this a bug or is there a clever way around this that I can't think of? --View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/multimeasure-rests-with-proper-measure-numbering-tf4045634.html#a11491878Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list address@hidden http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |