Re: GDP: six

lilypond-user

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GDP: six

From:	Juergen Reuter
Subject:	Re: GDP: six
Date:	Fri, 14 Sep 2007 18:22:11 +0200 (CEST)

Just for the record:

Ancient notation _could_ be split genre-wise into two separate chunks"Gregorian Chant" and "Mensural Notation". However, for a _reference_manual, I think it is ok as it currently is (e.g. having a single sectionon ligatures rather than separate ones per genre). For a _tutorial_,however, IMO you definitely would like to split it genre-wise.


Greetings,
Juergen

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

GDP: six, Graham Percival, 2007/09/14
- Re: GDP: six, Juergen Reuter <=
  - Re: GDP: six, Valentin Villenave, 2007/09/14
    - Re: GDP: six, Graham Percival, 2007/09/14
- Re: GDP: six, Jean-Charles Malahieude, 2007/09/14
  - Re: GDP: six, Graham Percival, 2007/09/14
- Re: GDP: six, Eyolf Østrem, 2007/09/14
  - Re: GDP: six, Graham Percival, 2007/09/14
    - Re: GDP: six, Valentin Villenave, 2007/09/14
    - Re: GDP: six, Eyolf Østrem, 2007/09/14
    - Re: GDP: six, Kieren MacMillan, 2007/09/14

Prev by Date: Re: fourth rearrangement
Next by Date: Re: GDP: fourth rearrangement
Previous by thread: GDP: six
Next by thread: Re: GDP: six
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread