|
From: | Gerard McConnell |
Subject: | crankiness |
Date: | Sat, 25 Apr 2009 18:22:28 +0100 |
I've been looking at the Re: date in footer
thread; I can understand how the experts get annoyed. They're doing lots
of
volunteer work to develop what is a really beautiful (but horrendously difficult to learn) program, and figure that the rest of us should be doing our bit to sort out the
documentation and snippets. I'm sure we'd all like to help,
but as a new user
I think it would be presumptuous of me to start
rewriting/reorganizing documentation, don't you think? However, I
must
dispute one comment that I read in the
thread:
"The current person responsible for LSR also happens to be the most active patch-reviewer. Do you *really* want me to ask him to stop working on patches (i.e. new features, bug fixes, etc) and waste his time playing web-2.0 games that anybody with TWO BLOODY WEEKS OF LILYPOND EXPERIENCE could do?! The critical word in the above quote is
waste. Although I'm not a professional programmer (I'm a piano teacher),
at one time
I dipped my toes in the water and completed a MSc
in multimedia development. I came away from that experience with
the
conviction that good documentation is critically important. I believe that If Lilypond is to develop the widest possible user base and get the recognition it deserves the clarity and conciseness of the documentation is perhaps as important as the application itself. So, like I said, Lilypond is a really great application, but learning to use it is exceptionally hard work. MUCH harder than learning Music Publisher, Notator, Cubase Score, Finale, etc. Please be patient with the users; we're trying to learn it not just because it's free, but because it's excellent. |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |