Re: Advanced (web) LilyPond usage for multiple authors?

[MonAmiPierrot]

I'm sorry I can't help on this level cause I have little-to-no knowledge on
how all of this works.
If you know of something in the web that can be taken as an example (I just
found out a web-based LaTeX project http://code.google.com/p/latex-lab/ but
still under development) could you give me the link?
Thanks
H.
P.S. A very simple author/version control could be enough for 99% of needs
if other 2 points are available in some way.





Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
> 
> Well using commercial source control systems for handling lilypond
> projects seems quite odd. A wiki has many advantages to simple version
> control, though you could write a client that supports preview, multiple
> editions etc. But that would be a lot easier on a wiki platform.  
> 
>  ---- Original message ---- 
> From: Peter Chubb <address@hidden>
> Sent: 19 Jun 2009 14:22 +10:00
> To: Bertalan Fodor <address@hidden>
> Cc: MonAmiPierrot <address@hidden>,  <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: Advanced (web) LilyPond usage for multiple authors?
> 
>>>>>> "Bertalan" == Bertalan Fodor <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> Bertalan> A wiki would be perfect for this purpose I think. If the
> Bertalan> extension for the wiki is smart enough, it can generate
> Bertalan> various outputs.
> 
> Bertalan> MonAmiPierrot írta:
>>> Hello all, just some difficoult (but not stupid, I hope) questions.
>>> I talked about LilyPond in a conference on music edition and
>>> critical editions.  With my surprise, some musicologists (some of
>>> which don't even use Finale!)  asked me if LilyPond could be used
>>> in bigger critical editions projects (e.g., an opera) where
>>> multiple editors are involved. These editors would be:
>>> 
>>> 1- the copyst who does the big "physical" job of writing down the
>>> code 2- the main critical editor 3- some expert revisor 4- the
>>> final editor who cares about layout (and don't forget at point 0- :
>>> the orginal author!)
> 
> I'd prefer to use a source code control system for this kind of
> collaboration.  Because LilyPond is text based, things like Mercurial,
> Perforce, etc., work really well to allow collaborative work, and to
> track who did what.
> 
> --
> Dr Peter Chubb                              peter DOT chubb AT
> nicta.com.au
> http://www.ertos.nicta.com.au           ERTOS within National ICT
> Australia
>            Kernel Engineering Group (KEG): Where Systems Brew.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
> 
> 


-----
Piero Faustini

Main Software used:
- LyX 1.6.2 on WinXP sp3; EndNote & JabRef
- MikTex
- LaTeX class: Koma book
- Lilypond 2.12 for example excerpts
- BibLaTeX for bibliographies 


-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Advanced-%28web%29-LilyPond-usage-for-multiple-authors--tp24099693p24110906.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.