Re: quality of lilypond outputs of different WYSIWIG software

[Helge Kruse]

Daryna Baikadamova schrieb:
> There are many WYSIWIG software capable of opening and saving lilypond
> files, such as MuseScore, Denemo and Canorus.  However what are the
> quality of their Lilypond inputs and outputs?
>
> Also when we talk about "quality", we often mean the accuracy, how
> well the features are preserved, and how easy for a *human* to read
> and manually maintain the Lilypond output in the future.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Daryna

I tried MuseScore 0.9.4. I save a simple file in Lilypond format and 
open the file again. MuseScore hung. There is a newer version 0.9.5 but 
the release notes does not say anything about bug fixing in .ly file 
handling. I think, as long as the program cannot read its own files, the 
human readibility doesn't care.

But MuseScore works quite nice on the other hand.

Regards,
Helge