[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: svg output
From: |
David Raleigh Arnold |
Subject: |
Re: svg output |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:51:19 -0500 |
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:32:25 -0800
Patrick McCarty <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Patrick McCarty <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 9:44 AM, David Raleigh Arnold
> > <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> In
> >> /v2.6/Documentation/topdocs/NEWS.html:
> >> The SVG backend is now a fully functional backend.
> >>
> >> Please, can this be fixed this in 2.12? It is hardly a new feature.
> >> Hasn't it been out of commission long enough? TAI. Regards, daveA
> >
> > The SVG backend was completely redone between 2.13.2 and 2.13.4, so
> > you will see the improvements in 2.14 (unless you want to test a
> > development release).
>
> Also, please check out the links from my announcement a while back.
> You'll find a lot of information about what bugs were fixed and what
> features were added.
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2009-10/msg00057.html
>
> Thanks,
> Patrick
Thanks. So the answer is no. I thought bugfixes were applied
to stable releases. Regards, daveA
- svg output, David Raleigh Arnold, 2010/01/14
- Re: svg output, Patrick McCarty, 2010/01/14
- Re: svg output, Patrick McCarty, 2010/01/14
- Re: svg output,
David Raleigh Arnold <=
- Re: svg output, Graham Percival, 2010/01/14
- Re: svg output, Patrick McCarty, 2010/01/14
- Re: svg output, David Raleigh Arnold, 2010/01/16
- Re: svg output, Graham Percival, 2010/01/16
- Re: svg output, Hugh Myers, 2010/01/16
- Re: svg output, Dmytro O. Redchuk, 2010/01/18
- Re: svg output, Graham Percival, 2010/01/18
- Re: svg output, Dmytro O. Redchuk, 2010/01/18
- Re: svg output, Graham Percival, 2010/01/18