[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Footnotes documentation
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Footnotes documentation |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Dec 2011 08:19:52 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) |
David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
> David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> "address@hidden" <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> Le Dec 10, 2011 à 9:18 PM, David Kastrup a écrit :
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Why don't we have \footnote \default for autonumbering (just like with
>>>> \mark),
>>>
>>> We could...I don't understand how \default works, so I'm not sure how
>>> to make it work here, but a tutorial would get me on my way!
>>
>> Have you read "Scheme function usage" in EG?
>>
>> Anyway, let's take a look at two contenders:
>>
>> autoFootnoteGrob =
>> #(define-music-function (parser location grob-name offset footnote)
>> (symbol? number-pair? markup?)
>> (_i "Footnote @var{grob-name} with the text in @var{footnote}
>> allowing for the footnote to be automatically numbered such that
>> the number appears at @var{offset}. Note that, for this to take effect,
>> auto-numbering must be turned on in the paper block. Otherwise, no
>> number will appear. Use like @code{\\once})")
>
> Just seen "auto-numbering must be turned on in the paper block". Is
> there a use case where turning it off might make any sense? You have a
> per-event property of autonumbering anyway, don't you?
And "Use like @code{\once})" is nonsense even discounting the closing
paren. "Affects all grobs in the current time step like
@code{\once\override}" is presumably what you mean.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Footnotes documentation, James, 2011/12/10
- Re: Footnotes documentation, George_, 2011/12/10
- Re: Footnotes documentation, David Kastrup, 2011/12/10
- Re: Footnotes documentation, address@hidden, 2011/12/11
- Re: Footnotes documentation, David Kastrup, 2011/12/11
- Re: Footnotes documentation, address@hidden, 2011/12/11
- Re: Footnotes documentation, David Kastrup, 2011/12/11
Re: Footnotes documentation, James, 2011/12/12