[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Directed \tweak commands in 2.15.39
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
Subject: |
Re: Directed \tweak commands in 2.15.39 |
Date: |
Wed, 23 May 2012 22:59:47 +0200 |
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:10 PM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> Honestly? Our documentation was created in lots of little bits from
> different contributors at different times. If we hope to bring it into
> a reasonably more consistent state, discussing single lines and examples
> is going to be ridiculously inefficient.
>
> Instead, it would make more sense if people opted to take care of
> something like a chapter at a time, or the relation between two
> chapters, and brought them into line.
Good point. However, bearing in mind that GLISS may change (a lot
of?) things, i think it makes more sense to do it first.
best,
Janek
- Directed \tweak commands in 2.15.39, David Kastrup, 2012/05/23
- Re: Directed \tweak commands in 2.15.39, Janek Warchoł, 2012/05/23
- Re: Directed \tweak commands in 2.15.39, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/05/23
- Re: Directed \tweak commands in 2.15.39, David Kastrup, 2012/05/23
- Re: Directed \tweak commands in 2.15.39, Janek Warchoł, 2012/05/23
- Re: Directed \tweak commands in 2.15.39, Thomas Morley, 2012/05/23
- Re: Directed \tweak commands in 2.15.39, David Kastrup, 2012/05/23
- Re: Directed \tweak commands in 2.15.39,
Janek Warchoł <=
- Re: Directed \tweak commands in 2.15.39, David Kastrup, 2012/05/23
- Re: Directed \tweak commands in 2.15.39, Janek Warchoł, 2012/05/24
- Re: Directed \tweak commands in 2.15.39, David Kastrup, 2012/05/24
- Re: Directed \tweak commands in 2.15.39, Janek Warchoł, 2012/05/24
- Re: Directed \tweak commands in 2.15.39, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/05/23