[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: tunefl and other web services
From: |
Philip Thomas |
Subject: |
RE: tunefl and other web services |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Jul 2012 12:32:05 +0000 (GMT) |
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 at 18:37:00 +0200 David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>The overall more convex shape of women lends
itself better for smooth
>light gradients lending plasticity to a two-dimensional rendition. When
>aiming for a more
abstract rather than an anatomical impression of
>beauty, the fair sex offers definite advantages.
>
>One can further
enhance visual plasticity by working with large brushes
>and graduations of powder makeup. That does not work well
with the
>knotted landscape of a "handsome man".
David shows uncharacteristically loose thinking here in ascribing the
effect simply to "convex shape". There are some other unspoken factors that are
nonetheless essential to take into
account. For example, I myself am decidedly "convex" to the tune of some tens
of kilos, and I don't have much in the
way of a "knotted landscape". The word "plasticity" would be a less apt word to
use in connection with my anatomical
features than, say, "doughiness". Any large brushes and powder used to enhance
my image would be more akin to those
used in a bakery to glaze pies and flour-dust loaves of bread. But as convex as
I am, using my semi-naked image on a
website would be likely to attract criminal sanctions -- not from me, but from
the poor victims who felt aggrieved, if
not visually assaulted, by the effect my image had on their psyches.
So there's more to it than just convexity, I
suspect. Whatever the missing parameters are, I am personally lacking in them.
Not that I'm suggesting a more serious
analysis would be all that productive.
>Anyway, I did once beat a dead horse for a while (I tried getting it to
>stand
up again, as the first thought after it had collapsed with a
>sudden aorta rupture on the riding ground was a severe
colic attack). A
>rather traumatic experience I would not wish on anybody.
Now, here David's touch is more readily
apparent: I didn't immediately know whether it was easier to believe him or not
to. So I'll just have to wait to see
whether in future posts he starts mentioning sleeping dogs that he has let lie,
dead cats that he's swung by the tail,
and so on.
Anyway, my convex body was shaken by a good belly laugh when I read it. And
yes, I admit that am prepared
to take the horse story at face value, and I did feel sorry for the horse and
it's rider, even while I was momentarily
convulsed with laughter.
Cheers, Philip
- Re: tunefl and other web services, (continued)
RE: tunefl and other web services, Philip Thomas, 2012/07/12
Re: tunefl and other web services, James Harkins, 2012/07/12
Re: tunefl and other web services, Timothy Reeves, 2012/07/12
RE: tunefl and other web services,
Philip Thomas <=