Re: stylesheet structure

[Urs Liska]

Am Mittwoch, den 15.05.2013, 06:03 -0400 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
> Hi Urs,
> 
> > I don't know if it's the _best_ and _most flexible_ structure, but it
> > definitely looks like a _good_ and _flexible_ structure. 
> 
> I probably can't ask for any more at this stage.  ;)

Exactly.
You should take that as a "yes, but I won't take any responsibility"
answer ;-)

> 
> > (Just one question: Why is 6. named as it is?)
> 
> Good question. I guess I'm thinking of a situation where one wants to restyle 
> a certain piece of 'piano' (the "top level") music:
> 
>     Berceuse_Henle_concert.ly
>         \include Berceuse_notes.ily
>         \include piano_Henle_concert.ily
> 
>     Berceuse_Barenreiter_letter_landscape.ly
>         \include Berceuse_notes.ily
>         \include piano_Barenreiter_letter_landscape.ily
> 
> Somehow that hierarchy seemed more logical. Thoughts?

Does that mean "concert" represents a paper format? Then it is clear.
Otherwise I'd still not understand the naming scheme.

Urs

> 
> Thanks,
> Kieren.
>