lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

One beam, two voices?


From: John Kliewe
Subject: One beam, two voices?
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 06:39:44 -0700 (PDT)

Thanks very much Urs -- the tip about moving the \override outside of the \times did the trick.

The reason I duplicated the entire phrase in each voice is that I want to see the second group of 16ths in a single-beam group.  By limiting the dual-voice treatment only to the small tuple that really requires it, I am not able to join the beams the way it appears in the original Paderewski edition that I am typesetting.   My example has the beams I want, but the slur is much too high.  Your suggestion corrects that high slur, but doesn't join the beam the way I want.

Is there a way to accomplish both?  I know that both versions are technically correct, but I would like to mimic the original if possible.

--John K

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]