[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tuplet number direction
From: |
Trevor Daniels |
Subject: |
Re: Tuplet number direction |
Date: |
Sat, 16 Apr 2016 15:30:12 +0100 |
Thomas Morley wrote Friday, April 15, 2016 11:25 PM
> Agreed. I never considered to disallow tuplets over line-break.
> Gould has nothing to say about it? (I still don't own the book...)
She has a complete chapter devoted to tuplets. She talks of tuplets
across barlines (can be sub-divided with a tie or not, whichever is
deemed to be most helpful) but with no explicit mention of tuplets
across a system break, as far as I can see.
But if the tuplet is sub-divided across a barline, and that barline is
at a system break, then all that is needed is a tied note extending
across the break. LP supports this already.
Trevor
- Re: Tuplet number direction, (continued)
- Re: Tuplet number direction, Richard Shann, 2016/04/14
- Re: Tuplet number direction, Thomas Morley, 2016/04/14
- Re: Tuplet number direction, Simon Albrecht, 2016/04/14
- Re: Tuplet number direction, David Kastrup, 2016/04/15
- Re: Tuplet number direction, Phil Holmes, 2016/04/15
- Re: Tuplet number direction, David Kastrup, 2016/04/15
- Re: Tuplet number direction, David Kastrup, 2016/04/15
- Re: Tuplet number direction, Simon Albrecht, 2016/04/15
- Re: Tuplet number direction, David Nalesnik, 2016/04/15
- Re: Tuplet number direction, Thomas Morley, 2016/04/15
- Re: Tuplet number direction,
Trevor Daniels <=
- Re: Tuplet number direction, Thomas Morley, 2016/04/16
- Re: Tuplet number direction, David Wright, 2016/04/16
- Re: Tuplet number direction, David Kastrup, 2016/04/17
- Re: Tuplet number direction, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/04/15
- Re: Tuplet number direction, Thomas Morley, 2016/04/15
- Re: Tuplet number direction, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/04/15
Re: Tuplet number direction, Phil Holmes, 2016/04/13