Re: What to do wanting a 4th order Bézier?

[Simon Albrecht]

On 09.10.2016 12:07, Thomas Morley wrote:
> 2016-09-18 15:38 GMT+02:00 Simon Albrecht <address@hidden>:
> > On 18.09.2016 15:15, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
> > > > And finally with a better user interface
> > > Under what circumstances would you NOT want the end of one curve to match
> > > precisely the beginning of the next one?
> > > If “none”, then I would say an even better user interface would not
> > > require typing that set of coordinates twice.
> > I thought about that too – it also makes the data structure less complicated
> > if it’s a list of seven pairs. I added the new version to the LSR
> > <http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=1045>, awaiting approval.
> >
> > Best, Simon
> Hi Simon,
>
> I'm not sure what to do with this snippet.
>
> I had the impression Urs started to implement it in the source. Is
> that true? Urs?
> Otoh, the LSR runs 2.18.0. With this version the lsr-snippet is the
> only available possibility to do slurs this way, warranting it's
> approval, I'd say.
>
> Opinions?

In the end, it’s a UI design question, and a question on the 
relationship between LSR and openlilylib. Urs’ solution is much more 
sophisticated, of course, and its user interface is somewhat untypical 
in comparison to most LSR snippets.
I’d suggest to leave the LSR version as is (and approve it) and add a 
comment like

%% For a more refined solution to the problem, see <link-to-openlilylib>.

Best, Simon