[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Changing voice order...
From: |
Urs Liska |
Subject: |
Re: Changing voice order... |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Oct 2016 05:18:26 -0700 |
User-agent: |
K-9 Mail for Android |
Am 27. Oktober 2016 04:40:14 GMT-07:00, schrieb David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
>
>This concerns << ... \\ ... \\ ... ... >>
>
>If we have more than one voice, voices are assigned in order:
>
>1/2, 1/2/3, 1/2/3/4, 1/2/3/4/5, 1/2/3/4/5/6 ...
>
>while the documentation is quite explicit that, ordered from top to
>bottom, assignments should be more like
>
>1/2, 3/1/2, 3/1/2/4, 5/3/1/2/4, 5/3/1/2/4/6 ...
>
>namely keeping the small voice numbers for the inner voices. Now I am
>sort of afraid that changing this is likely to end pretty disruptive to
>existing scores. Even though I don't know how many really use the
>original ordering unchanged as well as intentionally.
>
>Thoughts?
I just stumbled over this for the first time recently (because I usually use
the othe construct with explicit voices). I found it disturbing that I can't
define the voices from top to bottom but have to apply a seemingly wrong
ordering.
This doesn't help you but I wanted to express some confirmation.
Urs
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
Re: Changing voice order..., Carl Sorensen, 2016/10/27
Re: Changing voice order..., lilypond, 2016/10/27