[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Book and variables -- lost how to remedy
From: |
Urs Liska |
Subject: |
Re: Book and variables -- lost how to remedy |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Nov 2016 21:11:08 +0100 |
User-agent: |
K-9 Mail for Android |
Am 11. November 2016 21:02:34 MEZ, schrieb Noeck <address@hidden>:
>
>
>Am 11.11.2016 um 20:42 schrieb Bernhard Kleine:
>> #(define-void-function (name val)(symbol? not-null?)
>
>It looks to me as if "not-null?" does not exist in guile. There is
>not-pair? and there is null? But not not-null? It works with not-pair?
>but that's probably not the right answer.
>
>Unfortunately, I can't tell you what the correct replacement would be.
I think scheme? should be fine as you can bind any scheme value to a variable.
Urs
>
>Cheers,
>Joram
>
>_______________________________________________
>lilypond-user mailing list
>address@hidden
>https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
- Re: Book and variables -- lost how to remedy, (continued)
- Re: Book and variables -- lost how to remedy, Federico Bruni, 2016/11/11
- Re: Book and variables -- lost how to remedy, Federico Bruni, 2016/11/11
- Re: Book and variables -- lost how to remedy, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2016/11/11
- Re: Book and variables -- lost how to remedy, Bernhard Kleine, 2016/11/11
- Re: Book and variables -- lost how to remedy, Simon Albrecht, 2016/11/11
- Re: Book and variables -- lost how to remedy, Bernhard Kleine, 2016/11/11
- Re: Book and variables -- lost how to remedy, Noeck, 2016/11/11
- Re: Book and variables -- lost how to remedy,
Urs Liska <=
- Re: Book and variables -- lost how to remedy, Bernhard Kleine, 2016/11/11
- Re: Book and variables -- lost how to remedy, Noeck, 2016/11/11
- Re: Book and variables -- lost how to remedy, Bernhard Kleine, 2016/11/11
- Re: Book and variables -- lost how to remedy, Urs Liska, 2016/11/11