[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Book and variables -- lost how to remedy
From: |
Bernhard Kleine |
Subject: |
Re: Book and variables -- lost how to remedy |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Nov 2016 21:18:52 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 |
Am 11.11.2016 um 21:11 schrieb Urs Liska:
>
> Am 11. November 2016 21:02:34 MEZ, schrieb Noeck <address@hidden>:
>>
>> Am 11.11.2016 um 20:42 schrieb Bernhard Kleine:
>>> #(define-void-function (name val)(symbol? not-null?)
>> It looks to me as if "not-null?" does not exist in guile. There is
>> not-pair? and there is null? But not not-null? It works with not-pair?
>> but that's probably not the right answer.
>>
>> Unfortunately, I can't tell you what the correct replacement would be.
> I think scheme? should be fine as you can bind any scheme value to a
> variable.
>
> Urs
>
Could you please make a concrete proposition?
thanks Bernhard
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: Book and variables -- lost how to remedy, (continued)
- Re: Book and variables -- lost how to remedy, Federico Bruni, 2016/11/11
- Re: Book and variables -- lost how to remedy, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2016/11/11
- Re: Book and variables -- lost how to remedy, Bernhard Kleine, 2016/11/11
- Re: Book and variables -- lost how to remedy, Simon Albrecht, 2016/11/11
- Re: Book and variables -- lost how to remedy, Bernhard Kleine, 2016/11/11
- Re: Book and variables -- lost how to remedy, Noeck, 2016/11/11
- Re: Book and variables -- lost how to remedy, Urs Liska, 2016/11/11
- Re: Book and variables -- lost how to remedy,
Bernhard Kleine <=
- Re: Book and variables -- lost how to remedy, Noeck, 2016/11/11
- Re: Book and variables -- lost how to remedy, Bernhard Kleine, 2016/11/11
- Re: Book and variables -- lost how to remedy, Urs Liska, 2016/11/11