[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: openLilyLib
|
From: |
Noeck |
|
Subject: |
Re: openLilyLib |
|
Date: |
Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:37:23 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 |
Hi Urs,
Am 17.11.2016 um 00:29 schrieb Urs Liska:
> Apart from the fact that this should be renamed to
> "edition-engraver/package.ily" it's not *you* as a user that will see
> the direct benefit. The benefit is that "edition-engraver" is now a
> tangible unit (a repo) that can have an explicit maintainer, a dedicated
> issue tracker and an individual list of people with push access.
I see. I think I misinterpreted quite some things.
> (I pulled this mail because the other one takes substantially longer to
> reply to)
Sure. And I should have done the tests I am doing now, before I wrote
it. It would have been more positive.
Best,
Joram