Re: Beams across rests

[Urs Liska]

Am 25.12.2016 um 21:04 schrieb Thomas Morley:
> 2016-12-25 19:56 GMT+01:00 Urs Liska <address@hidden>:
>> Bummer, this makes me sadly recall that I still have this "project" of
>> rewriting the beaming code open :-(
>> I think if I would have managed to finish that (or if I'll ever have the
>> time to pick it up [help and encouragment welcome ;-) ]) these problems
>> should also be covered.
>>
>> Urs
> 
> 
> Hi Urs,
> 
> an improved beaming code would be nice, ofcourse.
> Can't help with C++-coding, though.

I'm sure you can, I'm more or less learning it along the way too ;-)

But just to make this sure: the part of the code I started to dig in was
the one that decides how many beams/beamlets each stem gets (triggered
by the desire to get beam subdivisions right) (so this is what we're
talking about here). What I did *not* touch (and don't intend to) is the
code that decides *what* to beam in the first place (i.e. the
\autoBeamOn calculations).

Urs

> 
> My coding aims at implementing some special conditions, which surely
> will never be the default, but what I _believe_ Andrew wishes.
> He will surely report back :)
> 
> Cheers,
>   Harm
> 


-- 
Urs Liska
https://openlilylib.org
http://lilypondblog.org