Re: bug in \repeat percent?

[Blöchl Bernhard]

Am 24.01.2018 22:01, schrieb Thomas Morley:
> 2018-01-24 18:34 GMT+01:00 bb <address@hidden>:
> > Thanks for explanation! I read the Manual but the information is very 
> > densly
> > packed, easy to overlook something. But I do not find that in a second
> > reading of 
> > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/snippets/repeats.
> >
> > I tried
> >
> > \version "2.19.80"
>
> [...]
>
> Please refer to the docs matching your version. Sometimes they improve 
> ;)
>
> In
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/short-repeats#percent-repeats
> you could read:
>
> "
> Known issues and warnings
>
> Percent repeats will not contain anything else apart from the percent
> sign itself; in particular, timing changes will not be repeated.
> [...]
> Any meter changes or \partial commands need to occur in parallel
> passages outside of any percent repeat, e.g in a separate timing
> track.
> [...]
> "
>
> Same holds for bar-lines.
>
> Cheers,
>   Harm

Thank you for clarification! The description of \repeat percent in the 
manual for the latest lilypond version is extended and clearer. So my 
musical construct is outside the design limits of \repeat percent.

Clearly no bug but my misconception.

Thanks and regards