[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: About smallcaps
From: |
Jeff Kingston |
Subject: |
Re: About smallcaps |
Date: |
Mon, 02 Jun 2003 09:12:29 +1000 |
On Fri, 30 May 2003 17:04:01 +0200, Thomas Baruchel wrote:
>
> Brest, le vendredi 30 mai
>
> Hi, is there a way to redefine the smallcaps internal transformation,
> in order to have the smallcaps according to the Adobe's Blue Book
> recommandations:
>
> width = .9 of current width
> height such as x becomes a X with a new height being:
> height = height of current x
> + 1/3 (height of current X - height of current x)
>
> I don't know what lout basically does, but I have been using
> Adobe's transformation for some time and I like it. If @S could
> make the same thing, I'd be very happy.
No there isn't. There is a way to control the height of the small
caps (see the User's Guide) but nothing more detailed.
I don't think a formula like this one could be reasonably communicated
to Lout as such; it would need to be built-in. Which could be done if
someone wanted to argue that it was some kind of recognised standard.
Jeff Kingston
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: About smallcaps,
Jeff Kingston <=