[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lwip-devel] [bug #49139] IGMP "All Systems" vs MLD "All Nodes" inconsis
From: |
Simon Goldschmidt |
Subject: |
[lwip-devel] [bug #49139] IGMP "All Systems" vs MLD "All Nodes" inconsistency |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Sep 2016 11:06:30 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/53.0.2785.116 Safari/537.36 |
Follow-up Comment #5, bug #49139 (project lwip):
I'd say it makes sense to keep the address: even if *you* don't need it,
there's a possibility *someone* implements a filter that really does
add/remove addresses. And as we already have the address, I see no need to not
pass it on.
As to the actual subject of this bug: there's a fundamental difference in MLD
and IGMP: if you have IPv6 enabled, you
*always* need to handle the all-nodes group. In contrast to this, IGMP is
rather optional and can be enabled/disabled in products. As such, it makes
sens to pass the address on to the filter because it can be removed once
'igmp_stop()' is called.
However, I do see that it could be strange for people writing IPv6 code (or
netif drivers) that the all-nodes group has to be enabled without the netif
being explicitly told...
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?49139>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.nongnu.org/