[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-devel] netifapi limitations
From: |
Simon Goldschmidt |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-devel] netifapi limitations |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Mar 2018 09:25:56 +0100 |
Joel Cunningham wrote:
> On 03/19/2018 07:44 PM, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> > On 19/03/18 22:07, Joel Cunningham wrote:
> >> On 03/17/2018 11:16 AM, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> >>> On 16/03/18 13:48, Joel Cunningham wrote:
> >>>> On 03/15/2018 09:23 PM, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> >>> [..]
After being quite offline for a while, I just wanted to let you know
my opinion on this:
I think the current netifapi has its valid users. Adding a new API
somewhere around the socket API is a better idea, I think.
Thanks,
Simon
- Re: [lwip-devel] netifapi limitations, (continued)
Re: [lwip-devel] netifapi limitations, Joel Cunningham, 2018/03/16
Re: [lwip-devel] netifapi limitations, Sylvain Rochet, 2018/03/20
Re: [lwip-devel] netifapi limitations, Joel Cunningham, 2018/03/20