Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving

[Leon Woestenberg]

Hello Kieran,

K.J. Mansley wrote:

> On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 11:35, Atte Kojo wrote:
>  
>
> > This is because tcp_recved() only does an ack if there are no acks 
> > pending (delayed or otherwise):
> >    
>
> Well spotted.
>
>  
>
> > if (!(pcb->flags & TF_ACK_DELAY) &&
> >     !(pcb->flags & TF_ACK_NOW)) {
> >     /* ... comment deleted ... */
> >     tcp_ack(pcb);
> > }
> >
> > This effectively nullifies the tests in tcp_ack() in this case.
> >    
>
> That needs changing: any objections to me removing those checks in
> tcp_receive()?
>
>  
No objections from my side. Do we have clear definitions of the TF_ACK_* 
flags?

Regards,

Leon.

> Kieran
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lwip-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
>