Re: Re[4]: [lwip-users] lwIP Unix Contrib

[Rishi Khan]

I reported this problem a few months ago and even provided a patch.

http://savannah.nongnu.org/patch/?func=detailitem&item_id=6518

On Sep 2, 2008, at 8:49 AM, Guido Moritz wrote:

> That is why I didn't spend to much time on the options. As I already
> worked with lwIP before I have seen this check and thought it should
> be OK then. That is why I thought the problem was really the mem
> allocation.
> But if the check is incorrect, it is a bit of .... senseless. I'm
> sorry that I'm not deep enough in the code to provide any improvements
> (up to now!)
>
> Guido
>
>
> Antwort auf Mail vom 02.09.2008, 14:40 Uhr:
> Betreff: [lwip-users] lwIP Unix Contrib
>
> > On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 13:03 +0200, Guido Moritz wrote:
> > > OK, I think I should learn to play with the opts before starting
> > > debugging of 3rd party implementations. Thank you for your help.
> > > MEMP_NUM_SYS_TIMEOUT 15 is working very well...and here we go!
>
> > That's interesting.  We have a compile-time check in src/core/init.c
> > that you've got enough timeouts for the options you've requested, but
> > clearly there's something missing from that as it reckons you'd  
> > need 3
> > for the default options (which is what the unixsim provides) and that
> > wasn't enough.
>
> > Kieran
>
>
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > lwip-users mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lwip-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users