Re: LYNX-DEV Year 2000 Compliance

[T.E.Dickey]

> 
> to follow up on what T.E.Dickey said:
> 
> > > Oh, if we do so, it should be in the 2.8 release if possible.
> > I just added it to my list (will review the code & see what's best to say).
> 
> The VFAQ now states "will be a statement with 2.8" as our Y2K answer.
> I can take it out if you wish.
it should at least be mentioned in the release notes - I recall that there
was some questionable (to me, anyway) code when we discussed this last
fall; if I see it when reviewing, I'll do whatever's appropriate (if
simple, fix, if not make a note for 2.9...)
 
> Al
> 


-- 
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey