[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev internal links
From: |
dickey |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev internal links |
Date: |
Thu, 3 Sep 1998 12:33:23 -0400 (EDT) |
>
> 980903 Thomas Dickey wrote:
> > talking about experimental, let's go back to the issue
> > of Klaus' "internal links". I left them in 2.8 with the understanding
> > that consensus is that we'd remove them for the next release.
> > Is that correct? (Removing them is simpler than adding them ;-).
>
> you're going to have to remind people what this issue is about ...
hmm.
(If Fote were still connected, he'd send out a dissertation on the topic).
The gist is that Lynx can be configured to recognize links within a
document that don't behave the way Fote interpreted someone's draft
proposal. (He's more than likely correct, but spent a lot of words without
pinpointing the exact issue - ading words to an argument doesn't make it
cleared). It's in the code now, but not normally activated.
> SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb : address@hidden
--
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey
- Re: lynx-dev internal links,
dickey <=
- Re: lynx-dev internal links, dickey, 1998/09/03
- Re: lynx-dev internal links, Laura Eaves, 1998/09/03
- Re: lynx-dev internal links, dickey, 1998/09/03
- Re: lynx-dev internal links, Laura Eaves, 1998/09/03
- Re: lynx-dev internal links, dickey, 1998/09/03
- Re: lynx-dev internal links, Laura Eaves, 1998/09/03
- Re: lynx-dev internal links, dickey, 1998/09/03
- Re: lynx-dev internal links, nelsonhe, 1998/09/03