[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev Keys, an attempt to understand
From: |
Leonid Pauzner |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev Keys, an attempt to understand |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Feb 1999 15:25:56 +0300 (MSK) |
10-Feb-99 22:41 Klaus Weide wrote:
>> > 1. 2. 3.
>> >
>> > byte sequence ---> lynxkeycode ---> lynxactioncode
>> > (or ---> lynxeditactioncode)
> I looked at an old lynx2-4-fm.zip - from not long before 2.5, I think -
> the lynxkeycodes defined now, except for the recent MOUSE_KEY thing,
> were all already there as today. That means that in several years not
> one new code was added for a real key.
At least a Visited Links Page ("V") was introduced between 2.6 and 2.7
I have 2.6 binary (no sources) and see that no keys mapped to uppercase
letters, all keys were case-insensitive instead.
> Your concept, and more so J. Poons' ideas, now go to the other extreme -
> instead of adding nothing, try to include everything.
> Neither may be the best thing to do. Some middle ground may be to
- lynx-dev Re: Keys, an attempt to understand, (continued)
- Re: lynx-dev Keys, - a correction, Klaus Weide, 1999/02/13
- Re: lynx-dev Keys, an attempt to understand, Lloyd G. Rasmussen, 1999/02/10
- Re: lynx-dev Keys, an attempt to understand, Henry Nelson, 1999/02/10
Re: lynx-dev Keys, an attempt to understand, Henry Nelson, 1999/02/10
Re: lynx-dev Keys, an attempt to understand, dickey, 1999/02/10
Re: lynx-dev Keys, an attempt to understand, Henry Nelson, 1999/02/15
Re: lynx-dev Keys, an attempt to understand, dickey, 1999/02/15