[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev --disable-gopher, why not --disable-finger?
From: |
John Bley |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev --disable-gopher, why not --disable-finger? |
Date: |
Sat, 6 Mar 1999 12:23:52 -0500 (EST) |
On Sat, 6 Mar 1999, Webmaster Jim wrote:
> > Whoever wrote the very simple DISABLE_GOPHER, could you find it in your
> > heart to do DISABLE_FINGER?
> That was me...
Thanks! I use lynx on a linux-on-a-floppy system quite a bit and if
a "no frills" option can be implemented it means that a newer version of
lynx has a better chance of fitting.
--
John Bley - address@hidden
Duke '99 - English/Computer Science
Since English is a mess, it maps well onto the problem space,
which is also a mess, which we call reality. - Larry Wall
- lynx-dev --disable-gopher, why not --disable-finger?, John Bley, 1999/03/05
- Re: lynx-dev --disable-gopher, why not --disable-finger?, Webmaster Jim, 1999/03/06
- Re: lynx-dev --disable-gopher, why not --disable-finger?,
John Bley <=
- why not --disable--news (was: lynx-dev --disable-gopher, why not --disable-finger)?, Webmaster Jim, 1999/03/06
- Re: why not --disable--news (was: lynx-dev --disable-gopher, why not --disable-finger)?, Webmaster Jim, 1999/03/07
- lynx-dev Re: why not --disable-news, John Bley, 1999/03/07
- Re: lynx-dev why not --disable-news, Kim DeVaughn, 1999/03/07
- Re: lynx-dev why not --disable-news, John Bley, 1999/03/08
- lynx-dev Dead code removal (was: Re: why not --disable-news), Kim DeVaughn, 1999/03/08
- Re: lynx-dev Dead code removal, John Bley, 1999/03/08
- Re: lynx-dev Dead code removal, Kim DeVaughn, 1999/03/08
- Re: lynx-dev Dead code removal, Philip Webb, 1999/03/08
- Re: lynx-dev Dead code removal, Klaus Weide, 1999/03/08