Re: [m17n-list] Add arrows

[bd satish]

Hi,

> We are now using /> and /< - so there is no conflict.

That was just an example. Just because mapping A and B don't conflict
doesn't mean we go on bloating hi-itrans.mim.
If it's not related to ITRANS, it should not be in hi-itrans.mim.
Isn't that logical enough? Feel free to submit a new
file say "puncutation.mim" containing whatever arrows, mathematical
symbols, etc. may be needed.

> Disagree. It should be useful for some m17n devanAgarI users. Otherwise, most 
> people don't ever type य़् or ॼ्.

Disagree. Most people don't ever type → or ←  either.

--Satish


On 10 October 2013 00:23, विश्वासो वासुकिजः (Vishvas Vasuki)
<address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 1:07 PM, bd satish <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> I've mapped << and >> respectively to show up angle brackets, that is, «
>> and »
>> These are also very uncommon, but I need it for my work. Including
>> your changes conflicts with my use case.
>
>
> We are now using /> and /< - so there is no conflict.
>
>>
>>
>> >>  Point is it is important / de jour for some people (eg: me), who
>> >> receive messages such as
>>
>> Point is unless it is important for everyone else (not just me),
>> mappings should not be included in a central repo like m17n.
>
>
> Disagree. It should be useful for some m17n devanAgarI users. Otherwise,
> most people don't ever type य़् or ॼ्.
>
>
>
> --
> --
> Vishvas /विश्वासः
>