Re: kn-itrans.mim: About the updates in https://github.com/indic-transliteration/m17n-db-indic

[Mike FABIAN]

"विश्वासो वासुकिजः (Vishvas Vasuki)" <vishvas.vasuki@gmail.com> さんはかきました:

> On Tue, 22 Aug 2023 at 17:41, Mike FABIAN <mfabian@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> "विश्वासो वासुकिजः (Vishvas Vasuki)" <vishvas.vasuki@gmail.com> さんはかきました:
>>
>> > Thanks -
>> >
>> > I suppose that for kn, it is better to forgo
>> > independent vowels LLi = ಌ and LLI = ೡ
>> > but retain  ("LLI" (delete @-) "ೣ") and ("LLi" (delete @-) "ೄ").
>> >
>> > The reason is that kaLLi and aLLi should intuitively yield ಕಳ್ಳಿ and
>> ಅಳ್ಳಿ,
>> > while kLLipti should yield ಕೢಪ್ತಿ (since ಳ್ಳ್ after a consonant is very
>> > unusual).
>>
>> Typo? Shouldn‘t kLLipti yield ಕೄಪ್ತಿ ?
>>
>
> No ... should yield -
>
>
> U+0C95 : KANNADA LETTER KA
> U+0CE2 : KANNADA VOWEL SIGN VOCALIC L
> U+0CAA : KANNADA LETTER PA
> U+0CCD : KANNADA SIGN VIRAMA
> U+0CA4 : KANNADA LETTER TA
> U+0CBF : KANNADA VOWEL SIGN I

Oh, then

https://github.com/indic-transliteration/m17n-db-indic/blob/master/kn-itrans.mim#L238

;;("LLi" (delete @-) "ೄ")               ; not in ITRANS Kannada table ; 
(conflict) commented, to support the LL consonant cluster

was wrong because it adds U+0CC4 KANNADA VOWEL SIGN VOCALIC RR

-- 
Mike FABIAN <mfabian@redhat.com>
睡眠不足はいい仕事の敵だ。