[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?
From: |
Matt Birkholz |
Subject: |
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git? |
Date: |
Mon, 4 May 2009 19:28:37 -0700 |
> From: Chris Hanson <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 00:13:22 -0700
>
> OK, I did a complete conversion of the CVS repo to git using cvs2svn
> 2.2. There were no errors during the conversion.
Ummm... I think you mean "no errors were reported during the
conversion".
Some of the problem revisions (runtime/uenvir.scm revisions before
14.12) look truncated. Revision 14.11 (commit 94543b6c) has 293 lines
instead of 544. The other problem file, runtime/hash.scm, lost a
couple lines in revision 14.1 (commit 039bbb4d) and earlier? I could
not access earlier revisions. Presumably cvs2svn can, running on the
raw repository...
> I'm not very interested in supporting both CVS and git. My
> preference would be to use git for everything from here on. What do
> you guys think?
Whatever works for y'all.
I am definitely using git locally as I am often off-planet, with time
to do merges, or a little testing and development. But that is just
me tracking the project (whether in CVS/git/svn/etc) going forward,
and managing my own patchsets.
Perhaps you should just make the CVS repo. readonly and leave it as a
testament to 1986-2009. Commit the current HEAD and move forward with
git.
It would be neat if rolling back to the '80s was as convenient as a
git checkout, but this is a real can of worms. And history is dust.
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?, Matt Birkholz, 2009/05/02
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?, Matt Birkholz, 2009/05/02
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?, Chris Hanson, 2009/05/04
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?, Amit Saha, 2009/05/04
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?,
Matt Birkholz <=
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?, Matt Birkholz, 2009/05/09
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?, Taylor R Campbell, 2009/05/09
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?, Chris Hanson, 2009/05/09
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?, Chris Hanson, 2009/05/09
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?, Marijn Schouten (hkBst), 2009/05/10
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?, Arthur A. Gleckler, 2009/05/10
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?, Chris Hanson, 2009/05/09